Wow. While I am very happy to hear that, I can't figure out how that could be true at the same time as what I experienced on Thursday. What a confusing tangle. So what in the world happened at Ruth E. Dickinson on Thursday? It couldn't have been just a failure of the library filter, since the librarian told me that the library permitted pornography under "freedom of information." Was she wrong? Why did she think this was the case?
The reporter said she will look into this further and let me know what she finds out, so I am looking forward to hearing how this will all get cleared up.
What's more, among the reactions to my first post on this topic, some persons emailed privately to inform me that a debate on this topic already happened in Ottawa about a decade ago, when the library was revising its policy. This debate was covered on CFRA at the time. Apparently, the final decision at the time was that there would be filters on the children's computers, but not on the adult computers at the library. I don't know if that is still the case today.
I have no answers, only more questions.
READ MORE
Below are all my posts on this topic. The most recent are listed first:
- Smoke and mirrors: a fiery reaction to Coun. Tim Tierney's last response
- Planning for a petition against pornography in public libraries
- Lessons learned, and gearing up to fight pornography in libraries
- The Ottawa Public Library responds to my letter
- Update: Only child pornography is blocked out by Ottawa library filters
- Update: is pornography allowed at the library, or maybe not?
- Baby steps: Throwing pornography out of the public library
- Internet pornography is welcome at our local public library
 
 
